WWF-UK: No gold medal for the environment in the Athens Olympics

Skip navigation

Access key details

This site uses the UK government standard access keys, as shown below:

S - Skip navigation
1 - Home page
2 - What's new
3 - Site map
4 - Search
5 - Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
9 - Feedback form
0 - Access key details




Section navigation


No gold medal for the environment in the Athens Olympics

Friday 16 July 2004
The Athens 2004 Olympics have lost any chances for a medal on environmental performance, according to the first comprehensive assessment of the costs and benefits of the upcoming games by WWF.
The WWF report, Environmental Assessment of the Athens 2004 Olympic Games, calls on the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to ensure that future Olympic host cities strictly abide by official environmental rules and regulations.

It evaluates the environmental wins and losses of the Athens Olympics based on the Sydney 2000 Olympics benchmark for "clean and green" games. On a scale of 0-4, it rates the environmental component of the Athens Olympics at a very disappointing score of 0.77.

The lowest scores were given to areas such as environmental planning and evaluation, protection of fragile natural and cultural areas, waste management and water conservation, and the use of environmentally-friendly construction technologies.

The highest scores went to the fields of public transport, the improvement of existing infrastructure, and the promotion of environmental awareness. However, these wins may disappear when the Olympic Games come to a close.

"Unfortunately, the environment never figured as a priority in the planning of the Athens Olympic Games. While the IOC calls the environment its third pillar of Olympism, it has done very little to keep this from crumbling under the weight of other priorities," said Demetres Karavellas, Chief Executive Officer of WWF-Greece.

"Greece must now move forward and look at what can be done to reverse the environmental impacts the day after the Games."

According to the report, during the seven years since Athens won the 2004 bid to host the Olympics, the organising authorities made no effort to integrate the environment in the planning mainly due to the fact that the IOC failed to enforce the environmental regulations enshrined in the Olympics charter. As a result, the Athens Organizing Committee and the Greek government failed to deliver on their commitments to abide by basic environmental standards, such as the use of solar power and recycling and waste management.

WWF calls on the IOC to enforce strict standards not only in sport, but also in the environment and sustainable development. The IOC must respect the environmental component of the Olympic Games and ensure the mistakes of Athens will not be repeated by future host cities. WWF urges the Greek government to learn from the environmental wins and losses and integrate the environment in its overall development policy.

Read the report Environmental Assessment of the Athens 2004 Olympic Games on the WWF International website.
© WWF-Canon / Isaac VEGA
Loggerhead turtles in Greece - already under threat

WWF Olympic Environmental Scorecard

ISSUESCORE
OVERALL PLANNING 
Environmental planningDisqualified (0)
Environmental assessmentDisqualified (0)
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 
Protection of natural habitatsDisqualified (0)
URBAN ENVIRONMENT
Protection of open spacesDisqualified (0)
Increase of urban greenDisqualified (0)
Improvement of the built environmentSilver medal (3)
TRANSPORT
Public transportSilver medal (3)
CONSTRUCTIONS
Siting of Olympic venuesDisqualified (0)
Use of existing infrastructureFalse start (1)
Use of green technologiesDisqualified (0)
ENERGY
Green energyDisqualified (0)
WATER
Water saving schemeDisqualified (0)
WASTE
Integrated waste management and recyclingDisqualified (0)
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Social consultationFalse start (1)
TransparencyFalse start (1)
Public informationFalse start (1)
GENERAL ISSUES
Respect to environmental legislationDisqualified (0)
Public awarenessGold medal(4)
TOTAL SCORE(average)0.77 (Disqualified)

Gold medal (4) - very positive
Silver medal (3) - positive
Bronze medal (2) - average
False start (1) - disappointing
Disqualified (0) - very disappointing