Excess baggage? Time to reduce government flying

10 June 2010

13 Comments

We calculate that if the UK government reduced the excessive number of unnecessary flights it takes, it could save more than £100 million of public money over the next three years – as well as reducing its carbon emissions by at least 60,000 tonnes.

A new WWF-UK report – Excess Baggage: the case for reducing government flying – reveals the full extent of flights taken by government ministers and officials over the past three years. And a shocking 90% of those flights were within the UK.

The most common domestic routes were London-Edinburgh and London-Belfast, while the top non-UK short-hauls were to Brussels, Geneva, Luxembourg and Strasbourg. All reachable by lower-carbon train and ferry, or entirely replaceable by video-conferencing.

Our report found that if government departments followed their own best practice, they could cut at least 600,000 flights, reduce CO₂ emissions by more than 59,000 tonnes and save well over £100 million of taxpayers’ money over the next three years.

More immediately, it would help them meet the government’s commitment to reduce its own carbon emissions by 10% in the next year.

Government department flying records
Of the 22 government departments we contacted for our report, less than half had reduced the number of flights taken from 2007 to 2009.

The two best performing departments are Defra (Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) and Education, which together have reduced flight costs by 39% over the last three years.

The Department of Energy and Climate Change spent £715,115 on 1,378 flights last year – 676 of which were domestic.

The worst performers include the Department of Health and HM Revenue & Customs, both of which increased their flying during this period.

Some departments were unable to provide any data at all in response to our ‘Freedom of Information’ requests. Less than half were able to give us all the data we asked for. This suggests there’s an urgent need for government departments to improve the way they record flight data, as well as introducing clear travel standards.

Our director of campaigns, David Norman, says: “Businesses have done everything in their power to cut out wasteful spending on unnecessary flights during the recession. Yet our report shows that very few government departments have made similar efforts. They should start by cutting out at least one flight in every ten over the coming year.”

We’re delighted that the Scottish government has already agreed to join WWF’s One in Five Challenge, which will help them reduce their flights by 20% (cutting one in five flights) by 2015. We’d like to see the UK government do the same.

You can…

• Download the full report, Excess Baggage: The case for reducing government flying
• Download the Executive Summary
• Join the One in Five Challenge

News stories

• Our Rivers Awards 2010
  – vote now!
• Earth Overshoot Day – how can we get out of debt?
• Coal power station opposition goes global

Downloads

Excess baggage - Executive Summary

Excess baggage - Full report